|
6F Should we build a Railway? This can be imagined as a discussion
at a meeting of the shareholders of the Snailbeach Company. The arguments
will vary from time to time, so it can be done at three different points in
the history of the mine, under three different mine managers. Reference to
their tales will provide information about the way the mine was being worked.
The Wagoner’s Tale could be used as the basis for some arguments against
building a railway. Thomas
Lovett in 1785
1
Mine
working has just begun on a large scale. The Snailbeach Company is newly
formed. 2
Initial
results at the mine are very promising, with the first payments made to the
shareholders after only three months of working. Everyone is very confident
of success. 3
Old
Shaft has been started, and the adit to Wagbeach now drains the mine. 4
Land
has been leased on the coalfield at Pontesford three miles away and the lead
smelter is now working there. 5
In
1785 there are tramways, mainly in mining areas, with wagons pulled by
horses, but practical steam railway engines are not available. 6
A
horse drawn tramway would convey Galena (lead ore) from the mine to
Pontesford. 7
It
could also be used to take coal from Pontesford to the mine to power the new
pumping engine on Old Shaft. 8
Spending
money on using water power could be cost effective. The Wagbeach Adit can be
drained by building a water wheel powered by the fast flowing stream. This is
cheaper than buying a steam engine and having to buy coal. 9
Building
a tramway will require an Act of Parliament. 10
There
would be no other use for a tramway, and no income except that from the mine. 11
It
might be possible to use the gradient so that full wagons of ore roll down to
Pontesbury, and the horse only has to pull the empty ones and coal wagons up
to the mine. 12
Lead
will still needed to be taken to Shrewsbury by horse and cart. James Ray Eddy in 1862
1
Railways
are being built everywhere. There is now (since 1861) a railway from
Shrewsbury to Pontesbury. It ends at Minsterley, only two miles away. 2
The
railway at Minsterley can only be extended along the valley floor. It’s can’t
climb the steep hill to Snailbeach. 3
High
quality coal can now be brought to the smelter from other parts of
Shropshire, so the colliery at Pontesford is closed. 4
The
Pontesford smelter is closed. A new smelter has been built at Snailbeach,
with a flue a mile long to the chimney on Lordshill. More coal is needed at
Snailbeach than before. 5
Ore
dressing machinery is water powered. 6
Remember
James Ray Eddy is a Yorkshireman and uses Yorkshire methods. He uses that
phrase “I can’t thoil.” What he means that he’s not going to spend good money
on something he doesn’t think is worthwhile. He is careful of expenditure. 7
The
time of great speculation on railways, known as “Railway Mania” was in 1844-6
and its lessons had been learned. Many schemes had proved unprofitable. 8
Again,
a railway could only serve the mine. There was no other industry or community
to make use of a railway. 9
James
Ray Eddy’s experience is with metal mines, not railways. He is paid to make
the mine profitable. 10
Horse
and cart had worked adequately for the past 60 years and more, during the
most profitable period of the mine, when the greatest tonnage of lead was
being produced. Henry Dennis in 1875
1
Dennis
manages several different mines. He is interested in the latest technology
and has spent £10,000 on new mining and ore dressing machinery at Snailbeach. 2
The
mine machinery needed to work at great depth uses a great deal of coal. 3
A
new mining company had been formed in 1865 and the shareholders were anxious
to give the mine a long term future. 4
A
full size, normal gauge railway would not be affordable. The narrow gauge
railway proposed would be cheaper, and would cope better with tight curves
and steep gradients. 5
Dennis
surveys the line for the railway himself, and knows how to tackle the
problems. It is steep, but he knows that engines will cope with the gradient.
At the top there will be a long reverse shunt to gain extra height, and then
an incline up to the Engine Shaft on Lordshill (see map of the mine in 1900). 6
There
is a possibility of extending the railway to other profitable mines nearby,
notably Tankerville, Pennerley and Bog mines. This would provide extra income
for a railway. The Conclusion – what actually happened
1.
The
Act of Parliament permitting the building of the railway required a full size
track bed and a railway half of the full size gauge. A much smaller railway
would have been cheaper and quite adequate, but this was not allowed. 2.
The
railway opened in 1877, and by 1884 its full cost of £20,000 had been paid by
shareholders. 3.
14,000
tons was carried each year. Shareholders received a 3% dividend per year
until 1883. 4.
In
1884 the mines at Tankerville, Pennerley and Bog closed. This brought the
annual tonnage down to 5,500. 5.
No
more dividends were ever paid. Payments were only just enough to keep the
railway running. 6.
In
1905 a branch line was opened to a nearby stone quarry, largely through the
influence of Henry Dennis’s son. To work the extra traffic, a new engine
called “Dennis” was bought. The original engines were worn out and were
scrapped. The railway carried 20,000 tons a year for a while, and in 1900,
38,000 tons, before trade reduced. The railway returned to making a loss once
more. 7.
Snailbeach
Mine closed in 1911, so the original purpose and funding had gone. |