Bats
in
Mike Worsfold,
"SCMC Journal No.6"
It really began in February 1993 when the Shropshire Bat Group was
invited to descend Sheep Shaft at Snailbeach into Perkin's Level to establish
the presence of bats, at a time when the mine was threatened with infilling and
closure to make it safe. I was a member of that party, with only limited
experience of going underground, and had never heard of Shropshire Caving and
Mining Club until that time. In bright sunshine Steve Holding, Adrian Pearce
and Neal Rushton led us trembling to the brink and lifelined us down an
electron ladder. We found a few bats in the big stope and passed along into the
level to where the steel footbridge is now. The level was at that time blocked
a little beyond this point. Our leaders, for some reason, now decided that we
were ready for SRT (I didn't know it was called that then) and I had my first
lesson in abseiling from some rails down the pitch where Stuart Tomlins' red
ladder is now.
We then abbed down the Sand Slope and Andrew Mcleish and, I think, Colin
Hayton, went down the next pitch, but time was running short and the rest of us
stayed at the intermediate level. They didn't explain what lay below me on the
sand slope until I had clambered back out. We found enough bats to be sure that
this was an important site which should be protected, leading to a visit by Bob
Stebbings a few weeks later. They were mostly Lesser Horseshoe Bats, which are
quite scarce and threatened nationally, although they are the commonest bat in
our local mines. They are near the northern limit of their range here, being
confined to the southern and western parts of
Since then, I have been involved in bat counts in most of the
The results for some of the sites where we have made fairly consistent
surveys are shown in the table at Figure 24. In the table, I have only included
totals for the years when Eileen and I were doing (more or less) consistent
surveys. These are not the total number of bats we have seen, just the ones for
these sites. It can be seen that the counts at some sites seem to fluctuate
from year to year, usually with the losses at one being offset by gains at
another. Overall the numbers have been fairly constant, and some sites hardly
vary at all. Snailbeach had a bit of a dip but now has as many bats as when we
first counted them. The numbers in New Central have been particularly steady,
going back to 1984. Perhaps it is related to the fact that it is particularly
easy to count the bats there, unless there happens to be some at the mouth of
the little side passage, preventing you from putting your head in to have a
good look, for fear of disturbing them. I think this is what happened in the
1995/6 count when we only counted 19. The dip in numbers reported from Swan
Hill before I explored the place thoroughly may also be due to incomplete
surveying. The numbers in the little working at Rorrington seem to fluctuate
throughout the winter.
The numbers hibernating in any year must be affected by the fortunes of
the local summer roosts. Perhaps I should bring in a little bat biology here.
Female bats get together in summer and deliver and rear their young in communal
roosts near to suitable feeding habitats. Lesser Horshoe Bats, which are the
most frequent and important kind found in
Another interesting feature of the counts is that some sites contain
only Lesser Horseshoes but others are used by Natterer's and Daubenton's Bats
(lumped together as "myotis" in the diagram) and the odd Long-Eared
Bat. I am sometimes asked, and I wonder myself, whether it is the same bats in
any particular spot each year. It would be very hard to prove this without
marking the bats, and it is not easy to do this without risk of harming them,
but I am fairly sure that the simple answer is "yes". In some places,
you see one bat in almost exactly the same spot each year, and it is hard to
believe that this is the only spot in the area which can hold a bat. I am sure
that these bats continue to use the same berth each year. Bats live for a long
time, and are creatures of habit. This is another reason to protect every
roost. It may not be easy for a bat which has got used to a particular
hibernating pitch to find another one which is suitable to sleep in for five
months, in the short time available before it has to commit itself. Lesser
Horseshoes, as we have seen, often hibernate several miles from where they feed
in the summer. This is at least partly because the mines are not always
conveniently situated near to the best places to spend the summer.
The data is now becoming solid enough that we should soon be able to
start analysing them to answer questions such as which hibernaculae are
associated with which summer roosts. Perhaps the bats which hibernate a long
way from known summer roosts are males. We can't sex the bats in winter without
waking them up, which would put them at risk of not making it through the
winter. We think we know all the summer roosts nearby. Whatever detailed
(tentative) conclusions we wish to draw, it is clear that overall our
population seems to be fairly stable. This is significant for SCMC in two
important respects. Firstly, the continued presence of good numbers of a
threatened, protected bat must be a strong argument for preserving the mines
and maintaining access, at least for bats and bat counters. Secondly, we can
show that the activities of mine explorers in
We hope to keep on monitoring our bats for many years. We can't go into
their winter roosts with very large parties, especially some of the more
confined ones, but if anyone in the club (or any other reader) wants to come
along then get in touch with me or Eileen. There is usually room for one or two
extra people, and often we would be glad of an additional party member for
safety's sake. I would like to thank the club members who have helped us in the
past, especially when we were raw beginners, and everyone who takes care of the
welfare of the bats.
Results of Bat Surveys
|
LOCATION |
SPECIES |
WINTER
OF |
||||||||||
|
|
|
61 |
84 |
85 |
86 |
87 |
92 |
93 |
94 |
95 |
96 |
97 |
|
Burgam Lower Workings |
Lesser Horseshoe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
Myotis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Burgam Upper Workings |
Lesser Horseshoe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
8 |
|
|
Myotis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
Huglith Badger Level |
Lesser Horseshoe |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
4 |
8 |
13 |
4 |
|
|
Myotis |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Leigh Level |
Lesser Horseshoe |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
9 |
2 |
0 |
|
Potter's Pit |
Lesser Horseshoe |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
1 |
8 |
|
5 |
3 |
|
|
Myotis |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
5 |
|
4 |
3 |
|
|
Long-Eared |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Rhadley SW Workings |
Lesser Horseshoe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
8 |
16 |
16 |
|
Rhadley Wet Level |
Lesser Horseshoe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
Myotis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Rorrington No.4 Adit |
Lesser Horseshoe |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
16 |
11 |
20 |
|
Rorrington Deep Adit |
Lesser Horseshoe |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
3 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rorrington Top Stope |
Lesser Horseshoe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
Myotis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
Long-Eared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
0 |
1 |
|
Snailbeach Chidleys Level |
Lesser Horseshoe |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
5 |
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
Myotis |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
2 |
4 |
|
0 |
3 |
|
Snailbeach New Central |
Lesser Horseshoe |
|
20 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
29 |
23 |
|
|
Myotis |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Snailbeach Perkins Level |
Lesser Horseshoe |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
14 |
19 |
19 |
|
|
Myotis |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Swan Hill Lower Workings |
Lesser Horseshoe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
Myotis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Swan Hill Upper Workings |
Lesser Horseshoe |
|
|
80 |
39 |
52 |
|
55 |
55 |
87 |
x |
85 |
|
|
Myotis |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
0 |
x |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Lesser Horseshoe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
100 |
189 |
|
Total Myotis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
10 |
6 |
10 |
11 |
|
Total Long-Eared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
1 |
1 |